Do you think women have the privilege of misrepresenting the way they look with cosmetics/shaving legs/tanning?

The reason why there legs look good is because they shave them. The reason why there faces are pretty is because they where make up, eye shadow. The reason why there hair is pretty it because they spend hours styling it, the reason why there feet look nice is because they get pedicures....





What would society be like if it were'nt like this??





I AM NOT COMPLAINING I LOVE IT!!...Just wondering what you think it would be like....Do you think women have the privilege of misrepresenting the way they look with cosmetics/shaving legs/tanning?
There are so many things wrong with your statement:


1. Some women don't shave, and some don't even need to. Also, a lot of women look nice with jeans, so legs aren't so essential anyway.


2. Many (most) women are pretty without makeup, and a lot of them use it to make their features *better*, not cover them up.


3. Most women spend about 10-30 minutes on their hair, and some can just brush it and it'll look good.


4. With the economy like it is, not many women can get pedicures. Women just have naturally beautiful feet, unlike most men.





I think you have highly misinterpreted women in society. Bottom line--women are just beautiful, and don't *need* those things to be beautiful.Do you think women have the privilege of misrepresenting the way they look with cosmetics/shaving legs/tanning?
Not all girls are like that.





And society doesn't revolve around girls applying mascara and styling their hair for hours.